The Quest for Paradise

No one spoke so I went on in terms of making the picture of how they had been duped and lied to all their lives take on even more of a stark picture of contrast.

"Okay, could we have a star chart put up? Thank you. Everyone here should know that Polaris is the North Star. Someone tell me what constellation is always a quick aid in finding the North Star in the night sky?"

"The Big Dipper's forward two stars." Came a dazed sounding voice from the audience.

"You are correct. But why do these two stars point to the North Star?"

"Because the entire constellation rotates around the North Star."

"Again you are correct, but it's a lot more than just one constellation that rotates around the North Star. Can you show a time lapse of the stars please?"

The screen behind me changed until you could see the light trails of every star in the sky except for one, the North Star, which remained stationary.

"If you set up a time release camera this is what you're going to see. Every star in the sky is rotating around Polaris ie the North Star, while Polaris itself does not move. NASA tells us that Earth is traveling at a speed of 66,000 mph in its elliptical orbit around the sun. In addition to that they say that the Earth is spinning on its axis at around a 1,000 mph near the equator. In addition to that they say that our entire solar system is orbiting through the Milky Way Galaxy at 514,000 mph. Now match all those exaggerated motions up with what you're seeing here on this star chart. For simplicity we're dealing with three extreme rates of speed here: 66,000mph, 1,000 mph and 514,000 mph. If you just took just one of those outlandish numbers of movement and applied it to our Earth as a ball shape, do you think you could still maintain the perspective that you see being played out in our night sky night after night without fail? The answer is categorically no, because if the Earth moved at all our perspective of the overhead star constellations would shift and you wouldn't see this perfect circular rotation of every star in the heavens moving around the North Star day in and day out year after year after year. No constellation in the night sky would be recognizable because your point of perspective would be constantly changing and yet you have but to go out at night and spot the Big Dipper exactly where you would expect to find it. To better put the incongruity of the Earth being round and belonging to a specific solar system into perspective for you further would be to say that the only place on Earth, if it's round like NASA says, in order to be able to see such circular orbits of the other stars around the North Star would be to stand dead center on the North Pole and yet each of us can go outside and observe this phenomenon for ourselves. The only explanation for this cosmic fact of circumstances is that the Earth is flat and orbiting nothing. Earth, in fact, given this evidence of the movement of the stars, is at the exact center of the universe. What about gravity you say? Well I'm sorry to keep breaking cherished tenants of scientific faith for you, but Newton had it wrong as well. Gravity does not exist, but rather it would appear that elements such as temperature, density, and the mass of an object form the reaction that you know and call gravity. Some within the scientific community, perhaps even this room are now openly admitting that, but here consider this simple proof for why gravity according to Newton on a round Earth does not work as a plausible theory. The plumb bob, one of the oldest tools of architecture, is a heavy bulb shaped piece of metal that is fastened to the bottom of a length of string. When the string is held up the heavy metal bulb is permitted to swing back and forth. When it becomes stationary you know according to Newton that you have an exact vertical straight line, because the point of the heavy bulb is pointed to the gravitational center of the Earth. Okay. So you put a perfectly straight post in the ground that's lined up with the vertical length of string. Then walk 100 feet in another direction and repeat the exercise. Once again you put a new post in the ground that's perfectly aligned with the string. Both posts are straight and yet if the Earth was around the distance between the top of the two posts would be greater than the distance at their bases. If you were to build a structure of any kind on a round Earth the structure would be wider at its top than it would be at its base because of the degree of difference caused by the curvature of the Earth. No one here lives in such a lopsided structure because the Earth is flat and not a round ball or sphere. Do you begin to see the enormity of how all of humanity has been lied to for the past 500 years? Once you get past the shock of it, even common sense is enough to show that gravity cannot exist in any meaningful reality as Newton constructed. Picture the globe model that you have all been taught to accept without question and then realize that 70% of it is comprised of massive amounts of water. What's keeping the water in the northern hemisphere from all sliding to the southern hemisphere? They tell you in school that it's gravity that holds thousands of feet of ocean water in place and yet you and I who are comprised of 70% water and move about freely unduly affected by gravity as we go about our daily business when in theory if gravity is so strong as to hold the oceans in place then you and I should be glued to the surface of the globe like paper clips on a magnet. Some argue it's like the principle of a bucket full of water being swung around so fast that no water has a chance to spill out. No water escapes it's true, but it's definitely moving and moving quite violently. Do any of you feel such movement? In fact if one is to take NASA's word that the Earth is not only moving, but that it's actually spinning at a thousand mph near the equator than all it would take to prove a round Earth would be to jump into the air and discover that you've moved at least a hundred feet or more in the one or two seconds that you were airborne. This doesn't happen, obviously, just as a jet flying at 500 mph from New York City to London England doesn't have to travel an extra 1000 mph in order to overcome the spin of the Earth that it's supposedly flying against. Literally I could go on and on with scientifically verifiable proof after proof that are testable, observable, and repeatable that all prove that the Earth is flat, while all you have to go on is the faulty math of Copernicus and a government agency named NASA that faked the moon landing by filming it in a desert at night with a director from Hollywood who was paid a large sum of money to lend his cameras for the filming of the faked moon landing. The supposed moon rocks have all been shown up to be rocks from no other place but Earth. The European Union version of NASA, the ESA, just a few years back showed you the spellbinding journey of a satellite that they sent to an asteroid. A moving asteroid that they actually landed the satellite upon. They can accomplish all this, but somehow in 60 some years they've never been able to put a man back on the moon or even give you one photo other than the original faked Apollo moon shot of the Earth from space. The answer often given is that there is no reason to return to the moon, but then they're constantly releasing findings that tell the mass public that the moon is one big hunk of platinum and other precious metals so then the question is why wouldn't we be going back to the moon? We can send a satellite deep out into space and land it on a moving asteroid, but we can't repeat a 60-year-old three-day mission to our own moon? These are the people that the whole Earth is putting their faith in to tell you that the Earth is round. Copernicus by the way was an extremely wealthy man. He went so far as to build his own observatory in order to prove his theory, only he never installed a telescope within it. Again this man over all the ancient civilizations that told you the Earth is flat is the more believable one? So why the lie? Why is it so important to not let the average person on the street know that the Earth is flat? Well it's all about control. You need to go no further than to look at the UN flag to realize what's going on. Flag please."